Arabs start trending #AlTurkiParole to free Saudi man convicted of raping and enslaving Indonesian worker in the US

Saudi national Homaidan Al-Turki has been imprisoned in the United States since 2006, when he was sentenced to 28 years in prison for several horrific crimes he was convicted of committing against his family’s Indonesian domestic worker. The crimes included withholding the young woman’s wages, keeping her a virtual slave for four years and 12 counts of rape for the years of sexual assault the jury concluded he had put her through.

The 28-year sentence was later reduced to 8 years to life due to his good behavior as a prisoner. Now, Al-Turki is up for parole and his Arab supporters have started an online campaign, with the trending hashtag #AlTurkiParole, in an attempt to influence US officials deciding his fate.

 

The above tweet comes from Al-Turki’s son, who says he hasn’t seen his father in 11 years. It has been retweeted over 8,500 times at the time of writing.

Prominent Saudi cleric Awad al-Qarni tweeted:

 

Here are some more examples of the arguments made by Al-Turki’s supporters:

https://twitter.com/roro_upi/status/859690617957384192

https://twitter.com/sami15771/status/859530799317700608

https://twitter.com/JorryAlyaqout/status/859523071077732352

Unsurprisingly, there is no mention in any of their tweets about justice for the young Indonesian woman, identified in court documents only as Z.A., that Al-Turki was convicted of horribly mistreating and sexually assaulting for years.

Those charges were denied by Al-Turki at his trial, during which he said that that case against him was due to his religion and Saudi culture.

In relation to the charge that they had withheld Z.A.’s salary for years,  court documents filed by Al-Turki’s lawyers said that “there are Saudi Arabian customs regarding a host family’s retention of funds for their domestic servant until she leaves their service.”

In regards to the charges that she was not allowed to leave their home and not allowed to contact her friends, Al-Turki defended himself by saying, “The restrictions placed on her contact with non-relative males were also the same as those applicable to my daughters and other Muslim women in our community. You cannot ask somebody from a different religion to be American to the fullest. You cannot ask them to go dancing, go to the bars. We are Muslim. We are different. The state has criminalized these basic Muslim behaviors. Attacking traditional Muslim behaviors is a focal point of the prosecution.”

The prosecution fiercely objected to this line of defense, saying that the charges against Al-Turki had nothing to do with his race or culture and that it was a clear case of human trafficking.

Prosecutor Ann Tomsic provided evidence that the couple brought Z.A. to the US from Saudi Arabia to work for them when she was still a teenager. The affidavit says she was forced to care for the children, cook and cleaning for 12-hours a day, seven days a week without any time off from 2000 to 2004.

When she wasn’t working, the young woman was confined to an unheated basement and allegedly sexually assaulted by Al-Turki. Z.A. was only allowed out of the house by herself to take out the trash, bring in the mail and clean the yard.

The couple also confiscated her Indonesian passport and visa so that they could force her to keep working with little to no pay. Court documents showed she had been paid only $1,500 during her entire stay in the United States when, based on minimum wage laws at the time, the value of her services over three years should have been $96,044.92.

Privacy laws mean the identity and fate of Z.A. remain unknown, but she was paid some compensation money by Al-Turki’s family in exchange for some of the charge’s against him being dropped. The defense had argued that she had fabricated her accusations in an attempt to be able to stay in America, but she left for Indonesia immediately following the trial and never returned, despite having the legal right to stay in the country under the 2000 Trafficking and Violence Protection Act.

The Indonesian government banned domestic workers from going to Saudi Arabia and other Middle Eastern countries in 2015 due to innumerable cases of abuse, sexual misconduct, and enslavement. However, many desperate Indonesian women ignore the ban and continue to travel to the Middle East to acquire work in those countries illegally, a situation which puts them at even greater risk of abuse.

 



Reader Interactions

Leave A Reply


BECOME A COCO+ MEMBER

Support local news and join a community of like-minded
“Coconauts” across Southeast Asia and Hong Kong.

Join Now
Coconuts TV
Our latest and greatest original videos
Subscribe on